Marcas de oralidade em redações do Enem 2018

Abstract

This monograph aims to identify the marks of orality present in dissertativeargumentative texts of the 2018 National High School Exam (ENEM), focusing on marks such as morphosyntactic and phonetic-phonological inadequacies, subjectivity, dialogue with the reader, repetitions and slang. For this, 30 essays of Enem 2018 were analyzed, whose theme was 'Manipulation of user behavior through data control on the Internet', in order to analyze whether all the essays investigated in the corpus have such marks. The research is inserted in the area of linguistics and the subarea of sociolinguistics, as it deals with issues related to the oral and written communication process, since oral communication is developed in the social context and writing can in many cases be planned, in order to meet the grammatical formalities (this being normative), in this case, in Enem's textual productions. Thus, to develop the discussion of the object of investigation, the studies were based on theoretical references developed by authors dealing with this scope, namely: Koch and Elias (2018), Terra (2018), Marcuschi (2008), Coelho et al. (2015), Travaglia (2009), Enem Participant Primer (2018), Enem Editorial Writers Manual (2019); among others. In this sense, the objective of this paper is to identify the oral marks employed by Enem candidates in the writing of their dissertative-argumentative texts, since, according to normative grammar, the presence of these markers is prohibited in this type of textual production. Finally, it can be seen, after the analysis of the essays, that all texts read for this monograph have some orality mark according to the determined categories, demonstrating that even in the face of a more rigid textual production proposal, the candidates expose marks of their daily life before the formal writing required by the norm.