O Centro de Referência de Assistência Social e entidades de organizações popular na Vila Janaina: uma análise das expressões concretas de suas relações

Abstract

The study presents a historical and critical analysis of Social Assistance Policy and the participation of popular social movements as subjects of the construction of this policy, which presents in each context advances and setbacks that come together with the participation of popular social movements in Brazilian society. It points out that the Social Assistance Policy is a historical product of the relation between the working class and the capital, where the class struggle brings the public scene to the social question, which tends to be mystified by the State that through social policies seeks the reproduction of Labor force, as well as the conformation of the struggles that the working class hangs for the conquest of their rights. The thematic explains the functionality that the capitalist State attributes to Social Assistance Policy in the aporia of social protection as a confrontation of poverty and social inequality, in guaranteeing rights, but that is functional to the maintenance of the worker in the condition of poverty, as well as in the condition Of its conformity with the current order and demobilization of the worker as a political subject. It presents the analysis of the relationship between CRAS and popular organizations, a complex relation to the contradiction in which the Social Assistance Policy presents in its attributions the protagonism of its users, and the "overcoming of poverty", but it is a myth one Instead, the capture of Social Assistance by the capitalist and neoliberal state revitalizes intervention strategies aimed at solidarity and partnerships, making the social issue an individualized and depoliticized responsibility. Just as it innovates the strategies of cooptation and conformation of the working class through compensatory policies. The capitalist state innovates in the conception of the "outsourcing" of the popular organizations as we present in the work, as partners in the confrontation of poverty, through the socioassistential services potentialized through agreements, withdrawing from its essences the character of mobilizadoras and articuladoras of its community. We realized in the work that this practice was historically constructed as a strategy of demobilization of the working class through the cooptation of its grassroots organizations.