<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1">
    <title>DSpace Communidade: Biblioteca Digital da Universidade Estadual do Maranhão</title>
    <link>https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1</link>
    <description>Biblioteca Digital da Universidade Estadual do Maranhão</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6342" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6341" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6340" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6339" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-07-30T15:58:14Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6342">
    <title>A responsabilidade civil por abandono afetivo paterno-filial: uma análise da possibilidade de reparação à luz da Lei n. 15.240/2025 e da jurisprudência brasileira.</title>
    <link>https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6342</link>
    <description>Título: A responsabilidade civil por abandono afetivo paterno-filial: uma análise da possibilidade de reparação à luz da Lei n. 15.240/2025 e da jurisprudência brasileira.
Abstact: This study examines civil liability for parental affective abandonment within the Brazilian legal &#xD;
system, in light of Law no. 15.240/2025 and Brazilian judge-made law. The study addresses &#xD;
the  problem  of whether  affective  abandonment  constitutes  an  unlawful  act  subject  to  civil &#xD;
redress, particularly following the enactment of the aforementioned law, which amended the &#xD;
Child and Adolescent Statute to expressly characterize it as an unlawful conduct. Regarding &#xD;
methodology, the research is qualitative in nature, with an exploratory-descriptive approach, &#xD;
employing the deductive method and bibliographic and documentary techniques, through the &#xD;
analysis  of  legal  doctrine,  legislation,  and  judicial  decisions. The  study  examines,  first,  the &#xD;
evolution of the concept of  family and the principles that guide it; then, the requirements of &#xD;
civil liability and their application to affective abandonment; and, finally, the treatment given &#xD;
to the matter by the new law. The results indicate that affective abandonment constitutes an &#xD;
unlawful  act  subject  to  redress,  insofar  as  it  violates  the  parental  duties  of  care  and &#xD;
companionship,  and  that  Law  no.  15.240/2025  did  not  create  such  liability,  but  rather &#xD;
consolidated  an  understanding  already  established  by  legal  doctrine  and  judge-made  law, &#xD;
without dispensing with proof of the elements of civil liability, particularly damage. The study &#xD;
concludes that the effectiveness of the new statute will depend on its careful application by the &#xD;
courts, so as to ensure the comprehensive protection of children and adolescents without leading &#xD;
to the trivialization of compensatory claims.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-07-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6341">
    <title>Judicialização do direito fundamental à saúde no Brasil: uma análise sobre o acesso à medicamentos não incorporados ao SUS e os critérios dos Tribunais Superiores para a sua concessão</title>
    <link>https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6341</link>
    <description>Título: Judicialização do direito fundamental à saúde no Brasil: uma análise sobre o acesso à medicamentos não incorporados ao SUS e os critérios dos Tribunais Superiores para a sua concessão
Abstact: This research analyzes the judicialization of the fundamental right to health in Brazil, &#xD;
focusing on access to medications not included in the Unified Health System (SUS) &#xD;
and the criteria established by the Superior Courts for granting them. The study begins &#xD;
with the observation that, although the 1988 Federal Constitution established health &#xD;
as a right of all and a duty of the State, the realization of this guarantee faces structural &#xD;
challenges  regarding  pharmaceutical  services  and  the  incorporation  of  new &#xD;
technologies into the SUS, thereby driving the growing demand for judicial intervention. &#xD;
In  this  context,  the  study  seeks  to  address  the  following  problem:  how  do  the &#xD;
jurisprudential  criteria  established  by  the  Supreme  Federal  Court  (STF)  and  the &#xD;
Superior Court of Justice (STJ) for the judicial granting of non-SUS-listed medications &#xD;
attempt  to  reconcile  the  guarantee  of  the  fundamental  right  to  health  with  the &#xD;
organization and sustainability of the public health system? The study operates on the &#xD;
hypothesis that these criteria serve as a mechanism to rationalize the judicialization of &#xD;
health  by  establishing  objective  parameters  for  granting  such  medications.  The &#xD;
objective is to examine how the criteria set by the Superior Courts seek to balance the &#xD;
protection of the individual right to health with the preservation of public administration. &#xD;
To  this  end,  a  qualitative  approach  was  adopted—utilizing  bibliographic  and &#xD;
documentary research—grounded in the analysis of legal doctrine, scientific articles, &#xD;
legislation, and relevant court precedents. The study concludes that established case &#xD;
law points to the use of technical and evidentiary parameters that enable access to &#xD;
non-listed medications without disrupting the administrative, financial, and technical-&#xD;
scientific structure of the SUS.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-07-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6340">
    <title>A responsabilidade civil das plataformas digitais no combate ao discurso de ódio: uma análise da constitucionalidade do Art. 19 do Marco Civil após o entendimento do STF (2025-2026)</title>
    <link>https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6340</link>
    <description>Título: A responsabilidade civil das plataformas digitais no combate ao discurso de ódio: uma análise da constitucionalidade do Art. 19 do Marco Civil após o entendimento do STF (2025-2026)
Abstact: This research analyzes how the expansion of the internet and hyperconnectivity have&#xD;
profoundly transformed social communication, highlighting the urgent need to debate&#xD;
the actual limits of freedom of expression within social media environments. The&#xD;
primary objective is to re-evaluate the scope of this right when it is instrumentalized to&#xD;
propagate hate speech, thereby directly violating human dignity and the rights of&#xD;
minorities. To understand this issue, the study examines the foundations of the 1988&#xD;
Brazilian Federal Constitution, which guarantees the freedom to manifest thought and&#xD;
prohibits prior censorship, while simultaneously establishing the inviolability of honor,&#xD;
image, and human dignity. It is essential to differentiate legitimate opinion from hate&#xD;
speech, as legal doctrine maintains that attacks motivated by prejudice do not find&#xD;
constitutional protection. In Brazil, the primary regulatory framework for the network is&#xD;
the Civil Framework of the Internet (Law 12,965/2014). For years, the original&#xD;
mechanism of Article 19 determined that digital platforms could only be held civilly&#xD;
liable for third-party content if they non-complied with a specific judicial order for&#xD;
removal. However, this model faced severe judicial questioning, under the argument&#xD;
that it facilitated the perpetuation of harmful publications and irreparable damages.&#xD;
The central focus of this research is the substantial jurisprudential shift that occurred&#xD;
in June 2025, when the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) redefined the&#xD;
interpretation of the aforementioned provision. By reviewing the ministers’ votes, it is&#xD;
observed that the Supreme Court established a new normative landscape, imposing&#xD;
a more rigorous duty of care on social media providers and a proactive role in the&#xD;
systemic fight against hate speech. In conclusion, the research synthesizes that the&#xD;
interpretation of the legal framework needed to evolve to align with digital reality,&#xD;
establishing new parameters that preserve the internet as a democratic space while&#xD;
ensuring a secure environment where fundamental rights are respected.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-07-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6339">
    <title>A equiparação sucessória entre cônjuge e companheiro no direito brasileiro: reflexos do julgamento do RE 878.694/MG na proteção sucessória da união estável</title>
    <link>https://repositorio.uema.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6339</link>
    <description>Título: A equiparação sucessória entre cônjuge e companheiro no direito brasileiro: reflexos do julgamento do RE 878.694/MG na proteção sucessória da união estável
Abstact: This study analyzes the succession equality between spouses and partners under Brazilian law, &#xD;
focusing  on  the  legal  impacts  of  the  judgment  rendered  by  the  Federal  Supreme  Court  in &#xD;
Extraordinary Appeal No. 878.694/MG on the inheritance rights arising from stable unions. The &#xD;
research  begins  with  a  historical  analysis  of  the  evolution  of  the  family  and  Family  Law, &#xD;
demonstrating that the 1988 Federal Constitution substantially expanded the legal concept of &#xD;
family by recognizing stable unions as family entities deserving special state protection. In this &#xD;
context,  the  study  examines  the  legislative  development  of  stable  unions,  from  the  first &#xD;
regulatory  statutes  to  their discipline under  the  2002 Brazilian Civil  Code, emphasizing  the &#xD;
succession  regime  established  by  Article  1,790  and  the  doctrinal  and  judicial  controversies &#xD;
arising from the distinction between spouses and partners. The research critically analyzes the &#xD;
constitutional  grounds  adopted  by  the Federal Supreme Court  in  Extraordinary Appeal No. &#xD;
878.694/MG, which declared Article 1,790 of the Civil Code unconstitutional and determined &#xD;
the application of Article 1,829 to stable unions, thereby establishing equal succession rights &#xD;
for spouses and partners. Particular attention is given to the constitutional principles of human &#xD;
dignity,  equality,  family  protection,  family  solidarity,  affection,  and  the  plurality  of  family &#xD;
entities, as well as their influence on the interpretation of Brazilian Succession Law. The study &#xD;
adopts  the  deductive  method  through  bibliographical,  documentary,  and  jurisprudential &#xD;
research based on the Federal Constitution, the Brazilian Civil Code, Federal Supreme Court &#xD;
precedents, and leading Brazilian legal scholarship. The findings demonstrate that the Supreme &#xD;
Court's decision constitutes a landmark in the constitutionalization of Brazilian Succession Law &#xD;
by  eliminating  discriminatory  inheritance  treatment  between  spouses  and  partners  and &#xD;
strengthening the legal protection afforded to stable unions. It is concluded that the judgment &#xD;
of Extraordinary Appeal No. 878.694/MG consolidated the constitutional  understanding that &#xD;
there is no legal basis for maintaining distinct succession regimes for family entities equally &#xD;
protected  by  the  Federal  Constitution,  thereby  promoting  fundamental  rights,  substantive &#xD;
equality among family models, and a succession system more consistent with the principles of &#xD;
the Democratic Rule of Law.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-07-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

